The Female Quixote Is Not a Female Don Quixote

Thomas Gainsborough’s portrait The Honourable Mrs Graham, showing a young woman in a flowing white dress standing confidently in a wooded landscape.
The Honourable Mrs Graham (1775–77), by Thomas Gainsborough. National Galleries of Scotland. Via Wikimedia Commons.


Charlotte Lennox’s The Female Quixote is often described as a female version of Don Quixote. On the surface, the comparison makes perfect sense. Like Cervantes’ knight, Arabella has consumed too many romances. Like him, she interprets the world according to the conventions of books that no longer reflect reality. Like him, she leaves bewilderment and confusion in her wake.

Yet the deeper one reads Lennox’s novel, the less adequate the comparison begins to feel. Arabella is not simply Don Quixote in a dress. In some respects, she is a far more unsettling creation.

Cervantes’ knight lives inside a fantasy of chivalry that has become absurd because the world has changed around it. His imagination transforms inns into castles and windmills into giants, but the comedy rests on a basic agreement between author and reader: Don Quixote is mistaken. The world he believes in no longer exists.

Lennox begins from a similar premise, but she pushes it in a very different direction. Arabella’s ideas are certainly extravagant. Having been raised in isolation on a diet of sprawling seventeenth-century French romances, she expects abductions, concealed passion, heroic constancy, jealous rivals, noble despair, and declarations delivered at sword point. Every ordinary social interaction threatens to become part of a grand romantic narrative.

But unlike Don Quixote, Arabella is not foolish. Indeed, one of the novel’s most surprising qualities is the seriousness with which Lennox treats her heroine’s intelligence. Arabella is articulate, morally rigorous, widely read, and often more perceptive than the supposedly sensible people around her. Much of the comedy arises not from stupidity, but from the unnerving consistency with which she applies romance logic to the modern world.

And that modern world is not always presented flatteringly. This is where The Female Quixote departs from Cervantes. Don Quixote’s fantasies isolate him from reality. Arabella’s fantasies sometimes expose uncomfortable truths about reality itself.

Her notions of courtship, for example, are ludicrously inflated. She expects men to devote themselves with absolute constancy, to endure suffering in silence, and to regard women with near-religious reverence. Yet beneath the absurdity lies an implicit criticism of eighteenth-century courtship itself, which often left women with remarkably little freedom, leverage, or security. Arabella’s standards are impossible, but the world around her frequently seems morally inadequate by comparison.

The same tension runs throughout the novel. Arabella’s romance imagination gives her a strange kind of freedom. Because she interprets herself as the heroine of an elevated narrative, she feels entitled to judge men, reject expectations, challenge conventions, and impose moral demands upon those around her. Her absurdity protects her from conformity.

As the novel progresses, however, that freedom comes under increasing pressure. The social world closes around her. Family members, doctors, suitors, and authority figures gradually unite in an effort to return her to 'sense'. What begins as comedy slowly acquires a more ambiguous edge. Arabella’s cure is presented as necessary, but it is difficult not to notice what she loses in the process.

In this respect, The Female Quixote becomes something stranger than parody. It is not merely mocking romance fiction; it is asking what happens when imagination collides with a society that permits women few forms of independence outside fantasy itself. That question still feels surprisingly modern.

Arabella’s condition is often treated as comic delusion, but Lennox also understands it as something more profound: the experience of living inside stories so completely that they begin to shape perception itself. Arabella does not simply quote romances. She sees through them. They provide her with emotional expectations, moral categories, and a framework through which reality becomes legible.

The result is a novel that feels unexpectedly contemporary in an age saturated with narratives competing to explain the world. The details may differ, but the underlying problem remains recognisable. Human beings continue to absorb stories that reshape their sense of identity, morality, love, politics, and reality itself.

For all its wit and absurdity, The Female Quixote understands something fundamental: people rarely abandon the stories that give meaning to their lives simply because others call them irrational. That is one reason Arabella remains such a compelling heroine. She is absurd, but she is never merely ridiculous. And that is why The Female Quixote ultimately becomes much more than a female imitation of Cervantes.

It becomes a novel about the dangerous, liberating, and transformative power of fiction itself.

Yet if Arabella is more than a female Don Quixote, it is because her romances do more than provide comic misunderstandings. They shape the very way she sees the world. To understand The Female Quixote, we must look not only at what Arabella reads, but at how fiction becomes the framework through which she interprets reality.

Next: Arabella Lives Inside Fiction.

Volume I is published in paperback and ebook editions by P-Wave Classics.

📚 Explore the book and order here↗︎